My story, as rejected by #machineofdeath
November 4, 2011 1 Comment
OK, first off, the way-nicer-than-anyone-would-have-a-right-to-expect rejection letter. These guys are awesome…
Hi there,
First off, and with all sincerity: thank you for sending us “[null]“!
As you may have heard, five years ago when we did the original call for stories for Machine of Death 1, we received about 675 stories. This time around, we received almost THREE TIMES that amount, with 1,958 stories submitted. Not only were we blown away by how MANY stories we received, but we were also blown away by their raw quality. The bad news is that the reality we live in insists there’s only room for 30 or so stories in the book, and that means there’s going to be 1,920 stories that we can’t fit into Machine of Death this time around, regardless of how awesome they are.
Unfortunately, yours is one of them. We regret that “[null]” will not be appearing in Machine of Death 2.
Normally this is where an email like this would end, perhaps with a brief thank you for your submission. But we’re serious when we say the sheer quality of the stories we received staggered us. There’s enough excellence, there in our inbox, to put out FIVE really amazing volumes. And it would be a crime to leave these stories unpublished like that. Many of the stories that aren’t right for the Volume 2 anthology (for a bunch of different reasons: anthology pacing, variety, length, and so on) would fit wonderfully in any hypothetical future collection, or some other kind of MOD project down the line.
Of course, right now the focus will be on Machine of Death 2: on assembling the book, on getting the stories illustrated, on getting the finished book out into the world, and in making the whole thing as awesome as we can. But after that, if all goes well, we’d like to continue doing some really exciting things with these really great stories you’ve sent us. And we’ll be keeping your story in consideration for whatever those plans might be.
Obviously we can’t promise anything, and nobody can predict the future. But if all goes well, a while down the road, we may be able to send out some more acceptance letters. There’s a chance you could hear from us then.
Even if we’re never able to purchase your story and this is the last you hear from us about it, let us say this: thank you. You created something out of nothing, brought a new narrative into the universe, and shared it with us. Reading these stories has been a humbling and inspiring experience. Thank you, once more, for being a part of it.
If you submitted more than one story, we’ll be sending you an email with our decision for each of them over the next few days!
All the best,
- Ryan, Matt & David !
ps: we’re doing a Machine of Death event in LA on November 17th. If you’re in the area, come on out! We’d like to give you, as a Machine of Death story submitter, a MOD badge as a token of our appreciation. There’s more details about the event here: http://machineofdeath.net/nov-17
pps: If you’re interested, updates on the progress of both Volume 2 and future MOD projects can be found on our blog at http://machineofdeath.net
and now the story…
[null]
by Phil Oddy
Meatballs. Sauce. Cheese, of course. It wouldn’t be the same without cheese. Did I say extra cheese? I must have done. Oops. Salad; a bit of everything, but because I like salad rather than from any misplaced belief that piling the salad on will mitigate the effect of the rest of the contents of the sandwich. I shouldn’t be eating this stuff. I’ll be lying about it when I get home because what I should be doing is cutting back, watching my weight, staying healthy and staying alive. Because I have a pair of scales at home that keep topping fifteen stone and a card in my wallet that tells me I am going to die of ‘HEART FAILURE’.
I’m having a rough day, OK, and I need something in my belly to get me through the afternoon otherwise I know my willpower’s going to crumble and I’ll end up hitting the chocolate. And which would be worse?
I pay for my sandwich, plus a bag of crisps and a Diet Coke and head for the table in what we’ve established to be the analysts’ corner (by dint of the fact that we always sit there) where I can already see Geoff and Charlotte are sitting. I wonder if they’d like me to break their intimate chat with news of my rough day? I sit down next to Geoff.
Charlotte takes one look at my lunch, the sandwich filling oozing out of the sides of the waxed paper, giving me away before I can even pretend it’s chicken salad.
She raises her eyebrows.
“‘CHOKED ON A BEANSPROUT day, John?” she asks.
That is what I like to pretend my death card says when I’m having a bad day. It gives me license to avoid the healthy stuff.
Welcome to the Estrel Dawkins Institute. Mr Dawkins, as I’m sure you are fully aware unless you’re from the moon or the past or something, is the renowned inventor of the Dawkins Predictor, or Machine of Death, and his Institute exists to, and I quote the great man himself, “preserve the integrity of its legacy”. The Institute comprises Customer Support (predominantly based, predictably enough, in Bangalore, and servicing a worldwide user base of well over a million Machines), Engineering (who you can thank for the improved anaesthetic delivery system that, if you were tested in the last six years, means that the needle scratched fractionally less than it would have done otherwise), Legal and PR (simultaneously suing and seducing the Machine’s most ardent critics) and Data Analytics. That’s who we are, Geoff and Charlotte and me, Data Analytics. We’re the important ones. We’re here to save lives.
“How much did that set you back?” asked Geoff.
I shrugged. I hadn’t really been concentrating but I didn’t have a note in my change so it was more than a fiver.
“Prices are scandalous in here,” he muttered, biting into his homemade cheese and pickle.
I don’t have time to make sandwiches before I come to work. I barely have time to get home from the previous night’s work.
OK, when I say “we’re here to save lives”, that’s not really, like, the official line. Officially we’re here to apply “advanced analytical techniques” to the reams of data collected by the Machines around the world and identify patterns that might indicate faults, or Machine misuse, or an interesting story for PR to pump out. But we don’t see it like that. I don’t see it like that, anyway. We have a responsibility; we CAN save lives, ergo we SHOULD save lives.
There are some who still don’t believe that the Machine does anything more than a sophisticated combination of statistical reasoning and guesswork, but I’ve seen too much data, too much evidence. You cannot beat the Machine of Death. The Machine will tell you how you’re going to die, and that is how you’re going to die. It’s like Fate himself designed this thing. And once Fate has shown his cards…
I have a theory. I have a bunch of theories, but let’s start with this one. Let’s say there’s a terminal disease, like cancer for example, and let’s say that you analyse the death cards of millions of people, looking for those who are going to die of it. You plot them by age, country, demographic, whatever you can find, and you notice something interesting. Young people are far less likely to have a ‘CANCER’ card. People in Britain are far less likely to have a ‘CANCER’ card. Wealthy people are far less likely to have a ‘CANCER’ card. What’s more, there was a sudden drop off in the rate of ‘CANCER’ cards being produced for these groups almost ten years ago. You know that no-one’s produced a cure for cancer as yet, but you start to think that one must be pretty close, otherwise why would the Machine suddenly stop telling people that they’re going to die of it?
So you hunt around and you find a couple of pharmacologists in Cambridge who have an experimental cure, and you think it’s these guys – they’re the ones about to cure cancer. So you tell the world about the Christophi Gough method and suddenly half the philanthropists in the Sunday Times list sink their loose change into the project. The treatment goes to trial earlier than anyone expected, and it seems to work, but it’s expensive and it’s quite traumatic to go through, so the first people it really benefits are the young… and the wealthy… in Britain. It works, so it gets more funding, and then it gets cheaper and safer and easier to deal with and then it spreads around the world and before long, no more cancer. It saves millions of lives.
But who did WE save? There’s no denying that, without us pointing out that someone was close to the cure for cancer, no-one would have invested so readily. There would always have been a cure – the treatment would always have worked – but it wouldn’t have been ready so quickly. Here’s where it gets tricky. The only reason we could report that it would work was because we saw that it was going to work and, crucially, when it was going to work. But the only reason it started to work when it did was because we reported it. Paradox, much?
What happened, happened, when it happened, because we were looking for it. If we hadn’t been looking, it wouldn’t have happened when it did. How many people would have died whilst James Gough was traipsing, cap in hand, from research council to research council, trying to persuade them that his crazy idea might just work? I don’t know, but surely they’ve got us to thank for saving their lives? At least a little bit.
But maybe that’s just my perspective. It was my first big dataset. It got me this promotion.
“So what’s causing all the stress?” asked Charlotte, picking at a reheated, greasy stir-fry. She made the wrong choice today.
“Annual results. Samson wants me to come up with some ‘golden nuggets’ for the press release. We’ve got nothing new to talk about. Not since the road safety thing was kiboshed.”
“Do you have to?” asked Geoff, looking pained.
Samson is Legal Director, and Dawkins’ right-hand man. I’m meeting Dawkins at one. Yes, I have to.
The “road safety thing” was Geoff’s analysis. He found a glut of road deaths in rural India, the sort of concentrations that we don’t see very often, for precisely the reason that we’re looking for them. If ever we did see something like that, we would have a procedure (we don’t – we’ve never needed one) to raise the alarm and get it investigated. The faulty brakes or dangerous bend or lax attitude to drink driving laws would be discovered and fixed it some way and so no-one would die, and so there wouldn’t be a concentration of predictions saying ‘CAR CRASH’ or ‘HIT AND RUN’ or ‘HEAD THROUGH WINDSCREEN’ (I’ve seen that one. Ouch.) so there would be nothing for use to find. Geoff describes us as being in a stand-off with Fate. I think we’re on the same page.
On this occasion, Geoff thought he’d found something so we got all excited. What was going on? Was the cause something that couldn’t be prevented, even if we told everyone about it in advance? Was the Machine showing fallibility? Was this the first recorded instance of the Machine being wrong?
No. It was another, all too common, instance of Geoff being wrong. The Machine is only supposed to be used on human beings, it’s in bold in the terms of use, but it seems to work on animals too – guess their blood isn’t that different from ours – and from time to time you find a rogue operator who tries to bump up his profits by offering an extra service for pet owners. The Institute usually cracks down on it pretty quickly, especially since they introduced a flag into the system results set to spot non-human indicators. A flag which Geoff forgot to exclude from his analysis. We ran it all again, after we realised, and the concentration wasn’t even that high – dogs get hit by cars quite a lot especially, it would seem, in India, and everyone seems to accept that fact and aren’t about to start re-enigineering roads to prevent it.
The press release was written and signed off before we realised, but luckily it never got sent out. We’re kind of on probation at the moment.
Geoff put his fork down.
“You could tell them about the nulls,” he suggested. Fair play to him, he kept a pretty straight face
Charlotte giggled.
“Oh, yes!” I exclaimed, slapping myself on the forehead. “Why didn’t I think of that? I could tell them about the nulls!”
I couldn’t tell them about the nulls.
Planes don’t crash any more. Sure, some of them land in some pretty hairy ways (Lufthansa 451 on the autobahn outside Frankfurt springs to mind), but they don’t crash. Not one. Not since China Southern 327 disappeared en route to Los Angeles, and we revealed that we had ‘PLANE CRASH’ predictions for 97% of those on board (and no registered death cards for the rest of those missing). We didn’t manage to prevent it – we hadn’t been looking. It was only when it flashed up on the BBC News ticker that Charlotte suggested running the analysis. I still remember the chills that ran through me when I saw that statistic.
We looked back further. Only seven people died on FinnAir 042 but we knew about all seven of them. Nearly two hundred went down with ANA 962 but we had around 60% of those, and that was back when Death Machines were still outlawed in Japan. We felt we had to say something – we weren’t trying to cash in on anyone’s grief, just offer a hope that we could help prevent it happening again… But there was an outcry.
We were accused of gross corporate negligence, we were even accused of manslaughter. We were castigated for not telling the world what we knew before the plane took off from Guangzhou (conveniently ignoring the fact that we hadn’t known anything before the plane took off from Guangzhou). Dawkins was all over the television, explaining that it wouldn’t have made any difference, that the Machine was never wrong, that the plane was always going to crash and the passengers were always going to die. Legal and PR told him not to invoke Fate, but he slipped up when up against Paxman on Newsnight and for months we were labeled crackpots and the Institute compared to a some kind of sci-fi cult. The Scientologists spent millions trying to distance THEMSELVES from US.
But once the furore had died down, once the authorities across the world realised that banning people with ‘PLANE CRASH’ death cards was impractical (they’re just a bit of card, and therefore easily faked) and pointless (the Machine is never wrong – if you’ve got ‘PLANE CRASH’ then a plane crash is what you’re getting, be it private, commercial or woodworking), once we could get a word in edgeways again, we got the opportunity to put forward the simple proposal we had tried to get out there in the first place. Now, airlines supply their passenger lists to the Institute, any time of the day or night and, within the hour, we run the list against the death card register and flag any flight with more than three ‘PLANE CRASH’ death card-ers on it, or with more than 10% of the passengers having no recorded death prediction. We don’t require ID for people who have taken the test, but in most places you have to provide some kind of proof that you’re over 18, so we generally have a passport, driving license, National Insurance or Social Security number on record. It’s pretty rare that we can’t match 90% of any group of people to a death prediction, and when we do (or rather when Naveen over in Bangalore does), none of them say ‘PLANE CRASH’. Not any more.
Take that, Fate. Data Analytics is watching you…
I dropped most of the sandwich into the food waste bin, and slid the tray onto the rack. I glanced at the clock on the wall, I had ten minutes. I had nothing.
We changed the face of global terrorism. That’s what it said in the New York Times. We don’t like to talk about it within The Institute. We didn’t mean to. We didn’t even put out a press release when we realised that we could have predicted the Moscow bombings. It seemed in poor taste and we’d learned our lesson with the plane crashes. Remember, once the cards were out there we couldn’t have stopped those people dying, even if we’d found and linked the 88 ‘SUICIDE BOMB’ predictions more than a day beforehand. So we didn’t say anything, but we set up a trace and started looking for more.
We didn’t find any. Suddenly fuses failed, firing mechanisms started jamming, explosives started detonating early taking out warehouses (and the odd unfortunate jihadist) but civilians stopped dying. For nearly three years, no-one died at the hands of a terrorist of any religious or political persuasion. Again, the fact that we were looking, the fact that we could have sent out a warning, seemed to put Fate in a stranglehold that he couldn’t get out of. Until that first leader in the Times released him.
To be fair, they only suggested that it was us. They’d spotted a pattern and put two and two together, so they said. We may have speculated about a leak (we did speculate about a leak; we had reason to believe we knew where it had come from) but we had no proof and the existence of Data Analytics within The Institute wasn’t a secret, especially after the cancer thing and the plane crashes. We weren’t shy about blowing our own trumpet either – every time we refined the percentage uptake assumptions for another vaccination programme, every time we nailed the source of what could have become another public health scare – so it’s probably true that, if the Times hadn’t been tipped off them someone would have drawn the same conclusion, eventually.
At first we were modestly happy to take the credit. We’d, presumably, saved thousands of lives. If we had existed at the time (and if the Machine had existed, obviously) we could have prevented 911, and therefore the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and few on either side was going to lament that we weren’t ever going down those roads again.
But it wasn’t as simple as that. It appears that the New York Times has a circulation that reaches into terrorist cells, and the cause of all of their recent troubles had just been named. Now they knew we were watching them, that the Machine was watching them. So they hid.
How do you hide from the Machine of Death? Switch your objective away from ‘death’, would be a good start. So no-one dies as a result of terrorism any more, but a lot of people in Mombasa were crippled, hundreds of people were maimed in San Francisco, the infrastructure of Seoul is pretty much shot… you get the picture. Turns out that killing people is actually a lot harder than making their lives a living hell, so that’s what they decided to concentrate on. It’s kind of our fault that we found that out.
There are three flights of stairs between our pod and Dawkins’ office. I was nearly at the top of the third one, and my mind was as blank as the pad of paper I carried, that should have been covered in prep. I was seriously considering telling them about the nulls. I had to be going mad.
The nulls, then. Or, to be precise, the ‘[null]‘s. That’s it – they’re death cards like any other but they’re not in capital letters and you don’t usually get square brackets on a death card, although punctuation in general is pretty commonplace (all the way through to #s and @s – some causes of death are just plain weird). There also are more semi-colons than you might credit. But the ‘[null]‘s stand out.
We don’t know what they mean. Option one: they mean no death, live forever, golden ticket. That’s Geoff’s bet. But they seem more vague than that, and Geoff’s bet it usually worth ruling out early. A blank card (Machine malfunction notwithstanding) would certainly mean no death, but ‘[null]‘? Not for me.
The dictionary says it means “ineffectual” or “valueless”. So option two: the Machines aren’t working – Charlotte’s no-nonsense theory. But we have plenty of examples of Machines not working and they just don’t spit out a card. They don’t tell us when they’re not working, they just don’t work.
So option three (and this one’s all mine): the Machine’s not commenting on itself (it’s not “ineffectual” or “valueless”). Why would it? It’s not testing itself. It’s testing blood, so it’s the blood that’s “ineffectual” or “valueless”. We know that it can cope perfectly well with animal blood, so what is “ineffectual” or “valueless” blood? Is it “not blood”? Are there a lot of Machine operators out there who are pumping tomato juice into their Machines just to see what it does?
Except that the results are so scattered, and include places like the House of Representatives, the Vatican and the Chinese politburo where the Machines are kept in high security vaults to keep them away from saboteurs with a screwdriver and an agenda. Which leaves us with what? Genuine tests, genuine results, but the Machine doesn’t know what to do with them. People with “not blood” coursing through their veins. Everywhere.
The mind boggles.
And now I’m being called in.
Dawkins is sat in a tall, high-backed armchair. He fixes me with his steely gaze and nods a greeting.
“Good morning Mr Dawkins,” I say. He doesn’t reply.
I sit opposite him, across the shiny mahogany desk. To my right and his left is perched a nervous looking girl from PR, apparently straight out of school. She is holding a chewed up Biro that is hovering, quivering, over a reporter’s notebook. She keeps glancing from Dawkins, across to me, then back again, expectantly.
“So,” intones Dawkins, after letting her do this a few more times, “I think we all know why we’re here.”
“ah, yes,” I begin, before Dawkins cuts me off.
“We need a PR ‘win’,” he continues. “I am not happy with the murmurs I see in the press about the impact the Machine is having on our troubled society.”
He pauses here, and I’m about to agree with him when he abruptly picks up again. It’s like he’s doing it on purpose.
“We need to remind the world that the Machine is a force for good.”
Another pause. I just nod.
“And that is why you’re here…”
He gestures to me. I take that as my cue.
“Well,” I swallow, “Mr Dawkins. It’s been a bit of a lean period, breakthrough-wise…”
Dawkins raises his eyebrows. Except that now I look more closely he doesn’t really seem to have eyebrows. I plough on.
“But we do have some, shall we say, interesting results…”
“Shall we?” asks Dawkins. I refuse to be derailed.
“Well, at the very least they’re intriguing results. You see:” I take a deep breath. I’m going to do this. “We have a number, a growing number, of results, or should I say non-results – nulls – that appear to suggest that…”
I stop. Dawkins’ eyes are wide. I am struck by the fact that they are a deep red. Not bloodshot, just red. The irises are perfectly, completely, blood red. I try to continue.
“…suggest that…”
Dawkins holds up a hand. He has very long finger nails. They’re like talons.
“Enough!” thunders Dawkins, in a voice that seems to come from a void beyond reality. “I have heard enough.”
He rises from his seat; I had never realised what a stoop he had.
“I think it would be better if you left us,” he said, without looking at the PR girl. She scuttles out of the room without having to be told twice. I want to follow her, but Dawkins holds me within the tractor beam of his gaze. It seems an age before he speaks again.
“Do you even know what it is you’ve stumbled across?” he asks, now towering over me.
I think I manage to shake my head.
“You humans,” he scoffs, and at this moment his face seems to lengthen and stretch, “you know so little and yet you presume so much. You know not what you owe me, what you owe us. We only tried to help you to help yourselves.”
His breath stinks of rotting meat and menthol. I gag as he bends close to my face.
“We have been here since the dawn of your time,” he hisses, “and yet you remain so puny, so… fragile.”
Pieces start to fall into place. My mind feels like it is dropping down a chasm so deep that I don’t even know if it has a bottom, and won’t for some time.
“We have so many uses for you, but you break so easily. The Machine should have been your salvation. We give you the power to cheat death – to make yourselves strong – and, instead, you presume to come looking for us?”
He is right in my face now. There is no heat from his breath. He pokes a bony talon into my ribs. His touch is like ice.
“So what is it going to be?” he asks. I am suddenly confused as he straightens up as best he can, and leans away from me. He has plucked my wallet from my breast pocket.
My death card is inside, and now he holds it in his hand. He is squinting at it.
“‘HEART FAILURE’,” he reads. He looks to me and sighs. “Such a shame, it’s not much of a challenge, is it?”
He is smiling now. Smiling as he reaches a hand out and places it on my chest.
“There will be others,” he shrugs. “We retain some hope.”
He stops my heart.
